proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Six Circles Trust › 2024-2025

Six Circles Trust proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Six Circles Trust reported 38,763 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 31,409 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 96.6% of the time. On the 428 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 0.9% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

96.6% FOR of 31,409 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 30,347 AGAINST 922 Abstained or withheld 140

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

0.9% FOR of 428 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 428.

FOR 4 AGAINST 424 Abstained 6

See the 4 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Six Circles Trust, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (13 inferred) 21,487 21,327 97.6% 2.4% 128
Director Elections Shareholders (97 inferred) 97 94 2.1% 97.9% 2
Corporate Governance Board (5 inferred) 3,593 3,497 96.4% 3.6% 87
Corporate Governance Shareholders (74 inferred) 442 433 8.8% 91.2% 4
Capital Structure Board 3,186 3,168 96.7% 3.3% 2
Capital Structure Shareholders (55 inferred) 97 96 22.9% 77.1% 0
Audit-related Board (1 inferred) 2,705 2,703 99.1% 0.9% 2
Audit-related Shareholders (4 inferred) 20 20 20.0% 80.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 2,518 2,476 91.9% 8.1% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (4 inferred) 4 4 50.0% 50.0% 0
Compensation Board 2,302 2,295 94.6% 5.4% 7
Compensation Shareholders (22 inferred) 130 124 8.9% 91.1% 2
Other Social Issues Board 226 226 99.1% 0.9% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders (2 inferred) 260 258 2.3% 97.7% 2
Environment or Climate Board 55 55 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 293 293 0.0% 100.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 240 238 98.3% 1.7% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (2 inferred) 62 62 22.6% 77.4% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 34 34 94.1% 5.9% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders (11 inferred) 261 259 0.0% 100.0% 2
Extraordinary Transactions Board 207 206 96.1% 3.9% 1
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 2 2 0.0% 100.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 10 10 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 144 142 0.0% 100.0% 2
Other Board 24 22 100.0% 0.0% 2
Investment Company Matters Board 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (290 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Six Circles Trust broke with the board (616 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Six Circles Trust filed 38,763 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 36,463 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,387 issuer names and 6 funds. They cover 19,491 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
106 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted5 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type41 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote60 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Six Circles Trust proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.