proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › RBC FUNDS TRUST › 2023-2024

RBC FUNDS TRUST proxy voting record, 2023-2024

RBC FUNDS TRUST reported 13,317 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 9,954 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 83.8% of the time. On the 103 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 23.3% of the time.

2023-20242024-2025

On the board’s own proposals

83.8% FOR of 9,954 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 8,341 AGAINST 814 Abstained or withheld 799

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

23.3% FOR of 103 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 102.

FOR 24 AGAINST 79 Abstained 0

See the 24 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

RBC FUNDS TRUST, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board 6,191 5,294 92.7% 7.3% 792
Corporate Governance Board 1,196 1,163 90.8% 9.2% 27
Corporate Governance Shareholders (1 inferred) 30 30 53.3% 46.7% 0
Audit-related Board 1,132 1,129 99.1% 0.9% 3
Audit-related Shareholders (3 inferred) 3 3 100.0% 0.0% 0
Capital Structure Board 1,131 1,125 91.6% 8.4% 4
Capital Structure Shareholders (1 inferred) 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 949 817 89.1% 10.9% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (4 inferred) 4 2 100.0% 0.0% 0
Compensation Board 684 676 65.2% 34.8% 0
Compensation Shareholders (2 inferred) 14 14 0.0% 100.0% 0
Other Board 674 645 94.3% 5.7% 29
Other Shareholders 4 4 25.0% 75.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 151 151 93.4% 6.6% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 2 2 0.0% 100.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 37 37 97.3% 2.7% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 73 73 19.2% 80.8% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 52 37 70.3% 29.7% 15
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 11 11 90.9% 9.1% 0
Environment or Climate Board 5 5 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 35 35 22.9% 77.1% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 22 22 18.2% 81.8% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 4 4 25.0% 75.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (11 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where RBC FUNDS TRUST broke with the board (1,390 distinct proposals) →

What RBC FUNDS TRUST said it would do

The page above is what RBC FUNDS TRUST did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under RBC GAM, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
RBC FUNDS TRUST filed 13,317 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 12,218 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 947 issuer names and 14 funds. They cover 9,487 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
255 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type133 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote122 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 25, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

RBC FUNDS TRUST proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025.