proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Pacific Life › 2024-2025

Pacific Life proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Pacific Life reported 133,023 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 100,866 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.8% of the time. On the 1,297 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 5.5% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.8% FOR of 100,866 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 94,635 AGAINST 3,811 Abstained or withheld 2,420

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

5.5% FOR of 1,297 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,284.

FOR 71 AGAINST 1,226 Abstained 0

See the 71 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Pacific Life, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (558 inferred) 65,637 62,586 97.9% 2.1% 2,418
Director Elections Shareholders (36 inferred) 97 43 34.9% 65.1% 52
Corporate Governance Board 12,272 12,133 91.9% 8.1% 82
Corporate Governance Shareholders 1,009 1,004 34.8% 65.2% 3
Audit-related Board 11,509 11,505 99.8% 0.2% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (5 inferred) 121 118 97.5% 2.5% 3
Say-on-Pay Board 9,698 8,798 91.8% 8.2% 1
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (5 inferred) 5 5 60.0% 40.0% 0
Capital Structure Board (1 inferred) 7,637 7,624 91.6% 8.4% 2
Capital Structure Shareholders 173 160 92.5% 7.5% 0
Compensation Board (134 inferred) 7,140 7,105 87.9% 12.1% 20
Compensation Shareholders (21 inferred) 251 250 8.8% 91.2% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 1,576 1,573 80.5% 19.5% 1
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (4 inferred) 38 38 13.2% 86.8% 0
Other Social Issues Board 195 195 91.3% 8.7% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 747 746 7.4% 92.6% 0
Environment or Climate Board 75 75 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 756 756 2.1% 97.9% 0
Other Board 464 460 92.2% 7.8% 4
Other Shareholders 60 60 41.7% 58.3% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 61 61 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 434 434 0.5% 99.5% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 294 270 94.1% 5.9% 24
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (3 inferred) 80 80 90.0% 10.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 58 58 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 191 191 4.2% 95.8% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 4 4 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (767 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Pacific Life broke with the board (4,471 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Pacific Life filed 133,023 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 117,360 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 4,725 issuer names and 33 funds. They cover 53,688 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
1,639 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted108 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type898 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote633 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 25, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Pacific Life proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.