proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › MUTUAL FUND SERIES TRUST › 2024-2025

MUTUAL FUND SERIES TRUST proxy voting record, 2024-2025

MUTUAL FUND SERIES TRUST reported 13,149 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 11,230 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 88.9% of the time. On the 413 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 23.5% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

88.9% FOR of 11,230 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 9,987 AGAINST 652 Abstained or withheld 591

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

23.5% FOR of 413 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 377.

FOR 97 AGAINST 316 Abstained 2

See the 97 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

MUTUAL FUND SERIES TRUST, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (2 inferred) 8,553 8,004 95.3% 4.7% 492
Director Elections Shareholders (4 inferred) 16 11 81.8% 18.2% 5
Audit-related Board 1,069 1,038 86.0% 14.0% 23
Audit-related Shareholders (4 inferred) 5 5 60.0% 40.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 976 900 91.1% 8.9% 29
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (4 inferred) 4 4 75.0% 25.0% 0
Compensation Board 436 414 90.6% 9.4% 20
Compensation Shareholders (7 inferred) 71 71 36.6% 63.4% 0
Corporate Governance Board 343 307 88.9% 11.1% 14
Corporate Governance Shareholders (5 inferred) 149 147 41.5% 58.5% 2
Capital Structure Board (1 inferred) 279 251 97.6% 2.4% 21
Capital Structure Shareholders (2 inferred) 9 9 44.4% 55.6% 0
Other Social Issues Board (4 inferred) 16 16 75.0% 25.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders (11 inferred) 155 153 25.5% 74.5% 2
Environment or Climate Board 5 5 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders (9 inferred) 151 151 17.9% 82.1% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 41 41 100.0% 0.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (8 inferred) 59 59 79.7% 20.3% 0
Other Board 80 46 95.7% 4.3% 12
Other Shareholders (2 inferred) 4 3 0.0% 100.0% 1
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board (1 inferred) 2 2 0.0% 100.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders (8 inferred) 78 77 24.7% 75.3% 1
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders (5 inferred) 60 57 21.1% 78.9% 3
Extraordinary Transactions Board 37 30 86.7% 13.3% 6
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (1 inferred) 4 4 0.0% 100.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 5 5 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (78 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where MUTUAL FUND SERIES TRUST broke with the board (1,252 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
MUTUAL FUND SERIES TRUST filed 13,149 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 12,587 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 747 issuer names and 23 funds. They cover 8,771 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
166 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type135 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote31 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on November 1, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

MUTUAL FUND SERIES TRUST proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.