proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › MML SERIES INVESTMENT FUND › 2024-2025

MML SERIES INVESTMENT FUND proxy voting record, 2024-2025

MML SERIES INVESTMENT FUND reported 34,363 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 26,842 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 96.1% of the time. On the 965 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 12.3% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

96.1% FOR of 26,842 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 25,784 AGAINST 789 Abstained or withheld 269

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

12.3% FOR of 965 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 964.

FOR 119 AGAINST 846 Abstained 5

See the 119 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

MML SERIES INVESTMENT FUND, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (9 inferred) 19,507 19,171 97.9% 2.1% 266
Director Elections Shareholders 8 6 66.7% 33.3% 1
Audit-related Board 2,563 2,561 99.9% 0.1% 2
Audit-related Shareholders (3 inferred) 5 5 80.0% 20.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board 1,982 1,978 95.7% 4.3% 2
Corporate Governance Shareholders (1 inferred) 423 422 40.3% 59.7% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 2,203 2,109 89.9% 10.1% 1
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (3 inferred) 3 3 100.0% 0.0% 0
Compensation Board (2 inferred) 1,391 1,383 90.2% 9.8% 0
Compensation Shareholders (3 inferred) 149 149 30.2% 69.8% 0
Capital Structure Board 1,257 1,252 98.3% 1.7% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 25 25 72.0% 28.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 68 68 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 530 527 10.1% 89.9% 2
Environment or Climate Board 45 45 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 522 519 6.6% 93.4% 3
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 33 33 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 315 313 6.7% 93.3% 2
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 33 33 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 135 135 11.9% 88.1% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 74 73 95.9% 4.1% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (2 inferred) 72 70 78.6% 21.4% 1
Extraordinary Transactions Board 111 111 97.3% 2.7% 0
Other Board 16 16 87.5% 12.5% 0
Other Shareholders 14 14 7.1% 92.9% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (23 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where MML SERIES INVESTMENT FUND broke with the board (917 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
MML SERIES INVESTMENT FUND filed 34,363 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 30,566 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,170 issuer names and 19 funds. They cover 14,159 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
183 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type93 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote90 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 18, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

MML SERIES INVESTMENT FUND proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.