proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Legg Mason › 2023-2024

Legg Mason proxy voting record, 2023-2024

Legg Mason reported 52,272 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 40,716 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 95.7% of the time. On the 2,115 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 36.9% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

95.7% FOR of 40,716 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 38,958 AGAINST 1,224 Abstained or withheld 534

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

36.9% FOR of 2,115 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,820.

FOR 781 AGAINST 1,334 Abstained 0

See the 781 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Legg Mason, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (50 inferred) 28,990 28,449 98.0% 2.0% 490
Director Elections Shareholders 62 13 100.0% 0.0% 49
Corporate Governance Board 3,249 3,220 90.0% 10.0% 21
Corporate Governance Shareholders (1 inferred) 728 728 60.7% 39.3% 0
Audit-related Board 3,819 3,819 100.0% 0.0% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (4 inferred) 12 12 83.3% 16.7% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 3,612 3,117 90.6% 9.4% 20
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (8 inferred) 8 4 100.0% 0.0% 0
Compensation Board (25 inferred) 2,598 2,571 85.9% 14.1% 23
Compensation Shareholders 259 259 35.9% 64.1% 0
Capital Structure Board 2,048 2,045 97.1% 2.9% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 47 47 95.7% 4.3% 0
Other Social Issues Board 138 138 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,265 1,264 31.4% 68.6% 0
Environment or Climate Board 93 92 93.5% 6.5% 1
Environment or Climate Shareholders 951 951 22.6% 77.4% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 62 62 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 599 599 33.9% 66.1% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 62 62 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 480 480 31.5% 68.5% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 211 210 97.1% 2.9% 1
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 3 3 0.0% 100.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 119 106 92.5% 7.5% 4
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 73 72 90.3% 9.7% 0
Other Board 134 134 78.4% 21.6% 0
Other Shareholders 12 12 91.7% 8.3% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 77 77 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (88 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Legg Mason broke with the board (1,389 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Legg Mason filed 52,272 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 47,764 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,855 issuer names and 67 funds. They cover 20,468 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
556 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type483 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote73 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 18, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Legg Mason proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.