proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › JPMorgan › 2025-2026

JPMorgan proxy voting record, 2025-2026

JPMorgan reported 286,397 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 218,768 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.3% of the time. On the 1,758 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 6.1% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.3% FOR of 218,768 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 204,007 AGAINST 12,626 Abstained or withheld 2,135

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

6.1% FOR of 1,758 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,751.

FOR 107 AGAINST 1,651 Abstained 0

See the 107 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

JPMorgan, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (138,195 inferred) 138,195 135,765 95.2% 4.8% 2,060
Director Elections Shareholders (101 inferred) 101 100 30.0% 70.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board (43,701 inferred) 43,701 40,025 89.3% 10.7% 330
Corporate Governance Shareholders (2,076 inferred) 2,076 2,076 13.1% 86.9% 0
Capital Structure Board (23,161 inferred) 23,161 22,995 93.5% 6.5% 7
Capital Structure Shareholders (92 inferred) 92 91 82.4% 17.6% 0
Say-on-Pay Board (20,239 inferred) 20,239 19,125 89.4% 10.6% 6
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (45 inferred) 45 45 100.0% 0.0% 0
Audit-related Board (19,232 inferred) 19,232 19,157 97.6% 2.4% 13
Compensation Board (17,901 inferred) 17,901 17,774 90.1% 9.9% 66
Compensation Shareholders (92 inferred) 92 92 19.6% 80.4% 0
Other Board (3,226 inferred) 3,226 1,688 74.5% 25.5% 5
Other Shareholders (167 inferred) 167 167 6.6% 93.4% 0
Other Social Issues Board (1,805 inferred) 1,805 1,763 56.4% 43.6% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders (899 inferred) 899 899 6.7% 93.3% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board (2,603 inferred) 2,603 2,567 77.6% 22.4% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (1 inferred) 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 0
Environment or Climate Board (1,250 inferred) 1,250 1,239 42.7% 57.3% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders (603 inferred) 603 603 3.5% 96.5% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board (706 inferred) 706 701 59.3% 40.7% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders (412 inferred) 412 412 3.2% 96.8% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board (625 inferred) 625 620 70.3% 29.7% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders (442 inferred) 442 442 3.2% 96.8% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board (517 inferred) 517 478 88.3% 11.7% 37
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (164 inferred) 164 163 72.4% 27.6% 0
Investment Company Matters Board (18 inferred) 18 18 27.8% 72.2% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (278,273 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where JPMorgan broke with the board (5,692 distinct proposals) →

What JPMorgan said it would do

The page above is what JPMorgan did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under JP Morgan AM, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
JPMorgan filed 286,397 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 267,537 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 5,691 issuer names and 110 funds. They cover 64,460 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
6,629 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted5,589 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type839 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote201 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

JPMorgan proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).