proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › JPMorgan › 2023-2024

JPMorgan proxy voting record, 2023-2024

JPMorgan reported 310,182 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 203,770 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.5% of the time. On the 6,380 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 11.1% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.5% FOR of 203,770 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 190,596 AGAINST 11,510 Abstained or withheld 1,664

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

11.1% FOR of 6,380 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 5,814.

FOR 707 AGAINST 5,673 Abstained 0

See the 707 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

JPMorgan, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (118 inferred) 130,693 128,462 95.8% 4.2% 1,515
Director Elections Shareholders (35 inferred) 155 111 86.5% 13.5% 44
Say-on-Pay Board (6,508 inferred) 29,150 26,194 88.2% 11.8% 23
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (22 inferred) 22 12 0.0% 100.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board (52 inferred) 20,429 19,287 85.3% 14.7% 305
Corporate Governance Shareholders (924 inferred) 2,446 2,446 30.3% 69.7% 0
Audit-related Board (20 inferred) 20,352 20,216 98.6% 1.4% 38
Audit-related Shareholders (13 inferred) 30 21 76.2% 23.8% 0
Other Board (26 inferred) 19,905 9,032 94.5% 5.5% 593
Other Shareholders (97 inferred) 221 140 12.9% 87.1% 81
Capital Structure Board 15,679 15,447 90.2% 9.8% 45
Capital Structure Shareholders (25 inferred) 31 31 80.6% 19.4% 0
Compensation Board (47 inferred) 10,189 10,021 88.4% 11.6% 29
Compensation Shareholders (258 inferred) 734 734 4.1% 95.9% 0
Other Social Issues Board (320 inferred) 901 855 58.0% 42.0% 10
Other Social Issues Shareholders (1,014 inferred) 3,746 3,728 9.9% 90.1% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 2,482 2,452 90.8% 9.2% 14
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (1 inferred) 4 4 0.0% 100.0% 0
Environment or Climate Board (157 inferred) 202 202 31.7% 68.3% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders (614 inferred) 2,055 2,036 11.1% 88.9% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board (91 inferred) 91 91 22.0% 78.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders (411 inferred) 1,502 1,484 13.1% 86.9% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board (17 inferred) 738 575 83.7% 16.3% 131
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (278 inferred) 723 717 96.5% 3.5% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board (34 inferred) 52 52 3.8% 96.2% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders (172 inferred) 658 658 8.5% 91.5% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 5 5 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (11,254 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where JPMorgan broke with the board (5,853 distinct proposals) →

What JPMorgan said it would do

The page above is what JPMorgan did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under JP Morgan AM, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
JPMorgan filed 310,182 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 258,833 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 7,448 issuer names and 107 funds. They cover 75,615 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
15,267 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted116 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type14,493 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote658 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

JPMorgan proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.