proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › John Hancock › 2023-2024

John Hancock proxy voting record, 2023-2024

John Hancock reported 438,082 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 318,670 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 89.2% of the time. On the 4,687 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 39.4% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

89.2% FOR of 318,670 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 284,408 AGAINST 26,182 Abstained or withheld 8,080

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

39.4% FOR of 4,687 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 4,199.

FOR 1,847 AGAINST 2,840 Abstained 6

See the 1,847 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

John Hancock, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (67 inferred) 186,309 177,107 93.8% 6.2% 7,836
Director Elections Shareholders (207 inferred) 253 245 29.8% 70.2% 0
Capital Structure Board 45,185 44,993 88.3% 11.7% 56
Capital Structure Shareholders (28 inferred) 140 140 67.9% 32.1% 0
Corporate Governance Board (4 inferred) 41,444 40,541 81.4% 18.6% 644
Corporate Governance Shareholders (55 inferred) 2,059 2,042 53.1% 46.9% 5
Audit-related Board (19 inferred) 34,444 34,303 97.5% 2.5% 108
Audit-related Shareholders (10 inferred) 87 60 73.3% 26.7% 0
Other Board 29,527 28,256 93.0% 7.0% 1,207
Other Shareholders (4 inferred) 288 184 19.6% 80.4% 103
Compensation Board 25,287 25,145 79.7% 20.3% 53
Compensation Shareholders (29 inferred) 710 707 28.1% 71.9% 0
Say-on-Pay Board (4,128 inferred) 25,895 22,973 85.3% 14.7% 20
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (20 inferred) 21 11 72.7% 27.3% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 8,416 8,367 87.0% 13.0% 8
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders (2 inferred) 15 15 13.3% 86.7% 0
Other Social Issues Board 1,401 1,382 92.0% 8.0% 15
Other Social Issues Shareholders 2,814 2,805 29.2% 70.8% 2
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 1,864 1,372 65.8% 34.2% 473
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (9 inferred) 541 535 86.9% 13.1% 1
Environment or Climate Board 122 110 58.2% 41.8% 12
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,600 1,590 43.7% 56.3% 1
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 1,047 1,044 43.5% 56.5% 3
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 10 10 50.0% 50.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 441 441 49.0% 51.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 17 17 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (4,582 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where John Hancock broke with the board (6,284 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
John Hancock filed 438,082 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 400,481 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 12,056 issuer names and 99 funds. They cover 133,741 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
4,932 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted248 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type2,814 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate1 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote1,869 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

John Hancock proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.