proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › JANUS INVESTMENT FUND › 2024-2025

JANUS INVESTMENT FUND proxy voting record, 2024-2025

JANUS INVESTMENT FUND reported 21,569 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 16,771 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 96.5% of the time. On the 547 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 8.6% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

96.5% FOR of 16,771 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 16,177 AGAINST 375 Abstained or withheld 219

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

8.6% FOR of 547 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 547.

FOR 47 AGAINST 500 Abstained 11

See the 47 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

JANUS INVESTMENT FUND, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (19 inferred) 11,187 10,943 97.9% 2.1% 207
Corporate Governance Board 1,829 1,824 96.7% 3.3% 3
Corporate Governance Shareholders (2 inferred) 215 211 40.8% 59.2% 4
Audit-related Board 1,707 1,705 99.9% 0.1% 2
Audit-related Shareholders 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Compensation Board (12 inferred) 1,369 1,366 94.5% 5.5% 3
Compensation Shareholders 62 62 40.3% 59.7% 0
Capital Structure Board 1,389 1,389 97.2% 2.8% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 15 13 46.2% 53.8% 2
Say-on-Pay Board 1,250 1,158 96.3% 3.7% 7
Other Social Issues Board 78 78 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 320 309 12.0% 88.0% 11
Environment or Climate Board 33 33 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 272 272 1.5% 98.5% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 25 25 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 165 165 1.2% 98.8% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 25 25 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 67 67 6.0% 94.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 47 46 93.5% 6.5% 1
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (1 inferred) 35 33 81.8% 18.2% 2
Other Board 68 68 80.9% 19.1% 0
Other Shareholders 9 9 11.1% 88.9% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 60 60 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 3 0 n/a n/a 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (34 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where JANUS INVESTMENT FUND broke with the board (389 distinct proposals) →

What JANUS INVESTMENT FUND said it would do

The page above is what JANUS INVESTMENT FUND did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Janus Henderson, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
JANUS INVESTMENT FUND filed 21,569 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 19,619 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 796 issuer names and 30 funds. They cover 9,302 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
127 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type85 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote42 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

JANUS INVESTMENT FUND proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.