proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Investment Managers Series Trust II › 2024-2025

Investment Managers Series Trust II proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Investment Managers Series Trust II reported 13,949 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 10,721 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 95.0% of the time. On the 383 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 4.2% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

95.0% FOR of 10,721 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 10,182 AGAINST 440 Abstained or withheld 99

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

4.2% FOR of 383 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 382.

FOR 16 AGAINST 367 Abstained 11

See the 16 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Investment Managers Series Trust II, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (4 inferred) 7,739 7,619 95.9% 4.1% 95
Director Elections Shareholders (6 inferred) 6 5 60.0% 40.0% 1
Corporate Governance Board 1,011 1,007 92.5% 7.5% 2
Corporate Governance Shareholders (12 inferred) 134 134 26.9% 73.1% 0
Audit-related Board 1,043 1,043 99.6% 0.4% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (10 inferred) 10 10 100.0% 0.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 1,031 984 92.7% 7.3% 2
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (4 inferred) 4 4 75.0% 25.0% 0
Capital Structure Board 455 451 93.1% 6.9% 2
Capital Structure Shareholders (6 inferred) 9 9 66.7% 33.3% 0
Other Board 434 168 95.2% 4.8% 3
Other Shareholders 14 14 0.0% 100.0% 0
Compensation Board 326 325 94.8% 5.2% 0
Compensation Shareholders (2 inferred) 47 47 8.5% 91.5% 0
Other Social Issues Board 23 21 100.0% 0.0% 2
Other Social Issues Shareholders 156 154 5.2% 94.8% 2
Extraordinary Transactions Board (3 inferred) 172 165 99.4% 0.6% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 0
Environment or Climate Board 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 133 123 3.3% 96.7% 9
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 107 107 2.8% 97.2% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 36 36 88.9% 11.1% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (2 inferred) 38 37 37.8% 62.2% 1
Investment Company Matters Board 51 51 86.3% 13.7% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 42 42 2.4% 97.6% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (49 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Investment Managers Series Trust II broke with the board (528 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Investment Managers Series Trust II filed 13,949 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 12,832 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 897 issuer names and 21 funds. They cover 9,445 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
346 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted7 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type312 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote27 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on November 1, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Investment Managers Series Trust II proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.