proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › HOTCHKIS & WILEY FUNDS /DE/ › 2024-2025

HOTCHKIS & WILEY FUNDS /DE/ proxy voting record, 2024-2025

HOTCHKIS & WILEY FUNDS /DE/ reported 14,087 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 11,587 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 94.7% of the time. On the 181 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 37.0% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

94.7% FOR of 11,587 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 10,977 AGAINST 458 Abstained or withheld 152

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

37.0% FOR of 181 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 181.

FOR 67 AGAINST 114 Abstained 0

See the 67 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

HOTCHKIS & WILEY FUNDS /DE/, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (27 inferred) 7,759 7,580 97.5% 2.5% 152
Corporate Governance Board 1,046 1,044 92.8% 7.2% 0
Corporate Governance Shareholders (1 inferred) 117 117 40.2% 59.8% 0
Compensation Board (12 inferred) 1,064 1,064 83.7% 16.3% 0
Compensation Shareholders (4 inferred) 44 44 50.0% 50.0% 0
Audit-related Board 1,074 1,074 99.8% 0.2% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (4 inferred) 17 17 76.5% 23.5% 0
Capital Structure Board 1,004 1,004 95.1% 4.9% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 20 20 55.0% 45.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 767 714 91.7% 8.3% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (4 inferred) 4 4 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 74 74 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 88 88 40.9% 59.1% 0
Environment or Climate Board 19 19 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 105 105 24.8% 75.2% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 72 72 93.1% 6.9% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 18 18 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 37 37 21.6% 78.4% 0
Other Board 39 39 43.6% 56.4% 0
Other Shareholders 14 14 0.0% 100.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 43 43 83.7% 16.3% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 8 8 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 18 18 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 30 30 30.0% 70.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (52 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where HOTCHKIS & WILEY FUNDS /DE/ broke with the board (549 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
HOTCHKIS & WILEY FUNDS /DE/ filed 14,087 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 13,102 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 785 issuer names and 12 funds. They cover 8,575 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
82 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type53 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote29 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 18, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

HOTCHKIS & WILEY FUNDS /DE/ proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.