proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Harbor ETF Trust › 2024-2025

Harbor ETF Trust proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Harbor ETF Trust reported 21,436 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 17,338 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 97.2% of the time. On the 451 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 9.5% of the time.

2024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

97.2% FOR of 17,338 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 16,851 AGAINST 298 Abstained or withheld 189

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

9.5% FOR of 451 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 449.

FOR 43 AGAINST 408 Abstained 2

See the 43 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Harbor ETF Trust, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (1 inferred) 12,579 12,367 98.8% 1.2% 184
Director Elections Shareholders (5 inferred) 5 5 0.0% 100.0% 0
Audit-related Board 1,895 1,894 99.6% 0.4% 1
Audit-related Shareholders (1 inferred) 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 1,786 1,644 96.5% 3.5% 1
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (1 inferred) 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Board 1,027 1,008 95.6% 4.4% 18
Other Shareholders 6 6 33.3% 66.7% 0
Corporate Governance Board 850 815 93.9% 6.1% 30
Corporate Governance Shareholders (8 inferred) 167 163 31.9% 68.1% 4
Compensation Board 638 637 91.4% 8.6% 1
Compensation Shareholders (2 inferred) 64 64 25.0% 75.0% 0
Capital Structure Board 601 597 94.1% 5.9% 2
Capital Structure Shareholders (4 inferred) 12 11 54.5% 45.5% 1
Other Social Issues Board 19 19 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 283 281 10.3% 89.7% 2
Environment or Climate Board 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 122 122 4.1% 95.9% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 104 104 17.3% 82.7% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 59 51 90.2% 9.8% 7
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (11 inferred) 40 37 56.8% 43.2% 3
Extraordinary Transactions Board 55 55 94.5% 5.5% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 24 24 8.3% 91.7% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (33 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Harbor ETF Trust broke with the board (478 distinct proposals) →

What Harbor ETF Trust said it would do

The page above is what Harbor ETF Trust did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Harbor Capital, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Harbor ETF Trust filed 21,436 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 19,928 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 1,504 issuer names and 22 funds. They cover 14,927 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
177 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted1 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type139 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote37 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 18, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Harbor ETF Trust proxy season coverage: 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.