proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › GuideStone › 2025-2026

GuideStone proxy voting record, 2025-2026

GuideStone reported 53,357 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 38,811 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.3% of the time. On the 533 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 34.5% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.3% FOR of 38,811 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 36,205 AGAINST 1,860 Abstained or withheld 746

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

34.5% FOR of 533 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 530.

FOR 184 AGAINST 349 Abstained 0

See the 184 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

GuideStone, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (115 inferred) 25,694 24,822 96.4% 3.6% 747
Corporate Governance Board 6,106 6,077 95.2% 4.8% 26
Corporate Governance Shareholders (5 inferred) 751 750 55.9% 44.1% 1
Compensation Board (32 inferred) 3,753 3,748 85.6% 14.4% 1
Compensation Shareholders 78 75 60.0% 40.0% 0
Audit-related Board 3,612 3,612 98.7% 1.3% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (3 inferred) 24 23 78.3% 21.7% 1
Capital Structure Board 3,432 3,430 94.3% 5.7% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 33 33 87.9% 12.1% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 2,520 2,369 90.4% 9.6% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (3 inferred) 3 3 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 165 165 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 331 331 45.6% 54.4% 0
Environment or Climate Board 95 95 81.1% 18.9% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 304 304 22.0% 78.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 302 302 90.4% 9.6% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 4 4 25.0% 75.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 74 74 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 204 204 35.8% 64.2% 0
Other Board 150 150 67.3% 32.7% 0
Other Shareholders 56 56 37.5% 62.5% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 74 74 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 111 111 65.8% 34.2% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 95 93 95.7% 4.3% 2
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (1 inferred) 58 58 63.8% 36.2% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (159 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where GuideStone broke with the board (1,939 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
GuideStone filed 53,357 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 46,242 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 2,374 issuer names and 14 funds. They cover 28,316 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
288 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type151 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote137 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

GuideStone proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).