proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Franklin Templeton › 2024-2025

Franklin Templeton proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Franklin Templeton reported 162,588 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 114,104 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 89.7% of the time. On the 1,493 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 17.6% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

89.7% FOR of 114,104 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 102,322 AGAINST 8,756 Abstained or withheld 3,026

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

17.6% FOR of 1,493 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,490.

FOR 263 AGAINST 1,230 Abstained 0

See the 263 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Franklin Templeton, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (1,707 inferred) 65,120 61,931 94.3% 5.7% 2,992
Director Elections Shareholders (75 inferred) 82 82 23.2% 76.8% 0
Corporate Governance Board 32,895 32,643 90.5% 9.5% 233
Corporate Governance Shareholders (8 inferred) 1,785 1,777 59.9% 40.1% 6
Capital Structure Board (2 inferred) 21,934 21,926 89.7% 10.3% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 474 468 92.1% 7.9% 0
Compensation Board (436 inferred) 14,448 14,368 85.0% 15.0% 79
Compensation Shareholders (43 inferred) 370 370 42.4% 57.6% 0
Audit-related Board 8,852 8,850 99.3% 0.7% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (4 inferred) 429 423 95.0% 5.0% 6
Say-on-Pay Board (167 inferred) 3,681 3,505 90.8% 9.2% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (4 inferred) 4 4 100.0% 0.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 2,847 2,838 76.0% 24.0% 4
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 60 60 10.0% 90.0% 0
Other Board 1,455 1,451 91.5% 8.5% 4
Other Shareholders 208 208 45.2% 54.8% 0
Other Social Issues Board 613 613 95.1% 4.9% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 926 922 18.7% 81.3% 0
Environment or Climate Board 317 317 99.1% 0.9% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 986 982 6.3% 93.7% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 249 249 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 516 514 6.0% 94.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 249 249 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 225 224 14.7% 85.3% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 317 228 85.1% 14.9% 89
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (10 inferred) 94 94 95.7% 4.3% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 9 9 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (2,456 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Franklin Templeton broke with the board (6,065 distinct proposals) →

What Franklin Templeton said it would do

The page above is what Franklin Templeton did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Franklin Templeton, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Franklin Templeton filed 162,588 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 150,351 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 4,467 issuer names and 65 funds. They cover 62,465 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
427 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type176 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote251 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 25, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Franklin Templeton proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.