proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Eaton Vance › 2023-2024

Eaton Vance proxy voting record, 2023-2024

Eaton Vance reported 90,084 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 63,205 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 79.7% of the time. On the 1,337 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 53.3% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

79.7% FOR of 63,205 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 50,392 AGAINST 10,623 Abstained or withheld 2,190

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

53.3% FOR of 1,337 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,180.

FOR 712 AGAINST 625 Abstained 0

See the 712 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Eaton Vance, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (665 inferred) 35,379 33,092 79.1% 20.9% 2,149
Director Elections Shareholders (10 inferred) 64 44 34.1% 65.9% 20
Corporate Governance Board (1 inferred) 21,860 21,735 90.6% 9.4% 104
Corporate Governance Shareholders (7 inferred) 937 930 66.6% 33.4% 7
Capital Structure Board 10,303 10,302 88.9% 11.1% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 78 78 79.5% 20.5% 0
Compensation Board (188 inferred) 9,894 9,850 78.6% 21.4% 35
Compensation Shareholders (7 inferred) 218 218 55.5% 44.5% 0
Audit-related Board 5,009 5,003 92.4% 7.6% 6
Audit-related Shareholders (3 inferred) 180 174 92.0% 8.0% 6
Say-on-Pay Board (2,024 inferred) 3,582 3,122 84.0% 16.0% 4
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (12 inferred) 12 6 83.3% 16.7% 0
Other Social Issues Board 487 487 81.9% 18.1% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 850 850 43.6% 56.4% 0
Other Board 1,163 1,161 76.3% 23.7% 2
Other Shareholders 154 154 54.5% 45.5% 0
Environment or Climate Board 200 200 92.0% 8.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 688 688 36.0% 64.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 766 763 86.8% 13.2% 3
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 166 166 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 374 374 36.9% 63.1% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 150 150 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 318 318 57.9% 42.1% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 194 149 81.2% 18.8% 45
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 33 33 90.9% 9.1% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (2,917 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Eaton Vance broke with the board (6,201 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Eaton Vance filed 90,084 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 87,405 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 4,168 issuer names and 35 funds. They cover 46,318 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
628 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type461 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote167 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 18, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Eaton Vance proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.