proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › EA Series Trust › 2024-2025

EA Series Trust proxy voting record, 2024-2025

EA Series Trust reported 75,484 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 62,905 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 76.7% of the time. On the 2,032 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 16.2% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

76.7% FOR of 62,905 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 48,222 AGAINST 9,856 Abstained or withheld 4,827

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

16.2% FOR of 2,032 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 2,025.

FOR 330 AGAINST 1,702 Abstained 109

See the 330 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

EA Series Trust, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (1 inferred) 48,232 43,229 81.9% 18.1% 4,596
Director Elections Shareholders (6 inferred) 6 4 75.0% 25.0% 2
Audit-related Board 6,307 6,299 91.3% 8.7% 7
Audit-related Shareholders (5 inferred) 5 5 80.0% 20.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 6,280 5,760 76.5% 23.5% 152
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (5 inferred) 6 6 16.7% 83.3% 0
Corporate Governance Board 1,987 1,930 85.1% 14.9% 50
Corporate Governance Shareholders (43 inferred) 930 904 27.3% 72.7% 26
Compensation Board 1,538 1,470 96.5% 3.5% 68
Compensation Shareholders (5 inferred) 305 304 31.2% 68.8% 1
Capital Structure Board 1,318 1,305 94.6% 5.4% 6
Capital Structure Shareholders (1 inferred) 24 24 83.3% 16.7% 0
Other Social Issues Board 49 44 100.0% 0.0% 5
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,222 1,122 17.5% 82.5% 100
Other Board 892 695 98.0% 2.0% 197
Other Shareholders (1 inferred) 17 15 60.0% 40.0% 2
Environment or Climate Board 4 3 100.0% 0.0% 1
Environment or Climate Shareholders (7 inferred) 729 719 12.5% 87.5% 5
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders (2 inferred) 476 468 15.6% 84.4% 8
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 187 175 93.1% 6.9% 7
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (28 inferred) 187 165 47.3% 52.7% 22
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 173 173 14.5% 85.5% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 112 111 95.5% 4.5% 1
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 2 2 0.0% 100.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (104 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where EA Series Trust broke with the board (6,162 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
EA Series Trust filed 75,484 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 69,617 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 2,566 issuer names and 59 funds. They cover 25,468 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
800 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type368 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote432 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 18, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

EA Series Trust proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.