Home › Asset managers › E Trade Trust › 2025-2026

E Trade Trust proxy voting record, 2025-2026

E Trade Trust reported 42,594 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 33,145 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 91.4% of the time. On the 313 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 26.8% of the time.

2025-2026

91.4%Voted for board proposals
26.8%Backed E&S proposals
38,585Ballot items
32,949Proposals
2,999Issuers
3Funds / accounts

On the board’s own proposals

91.4% FOR of 33,145 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

91.4% FOR

FOR 30,283 AGAINST 2,074 Abstained or withheld 788

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

26.8% FOR of 313 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 311.

26.8% FOR AGAINST

FOR 84 AGAINST 229 Abstained 4

See the 84 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

E Trade Trust, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal type	Put on the ballot by	Items	Decided	Voted FOR	Voted AGAINST	Abstained / withheld
Director Elections	Board (88 inferred)	22,779	21,784	94.5%	5.5%	788
Director Elections	Shareholders	2	0	n/a	n/a	2
Corporate Governance	Board	3,957	3,936	94.6%	5.4%	18
Corporate Governance	Shareholders (3 inferred)	578	574	50.7%	49.3%	2
Audit-related	Board	3,275	3,272	99.4%	0.6%	0
Audit-related	Shareholders (2 inferred)	19	18	61.1%	38.9%	1
Compensation	Board (20 inferred)	2,760	2,759	84.7%	15.3%	0
Compensation	Shareholders	44	42	38.1%	61.9%	0
Say-on-Pay	Board	2,611	2,434	82.9%	17.1%	0
Say-on-Pay	Shareholders (2 inferred)	2	2	100.0%	0.0%	0
Capital Structure	Board	1,997	1,996	95.9%	4.1%	0
Capital Structure	Shareholders (2 inferred)	35	35	68.6%	31.4%	0
Other Social Issues	Board	98	98	100.0%	0.0%	0
Other Social Issues	Shareholders	250	248	19.4%	80.6%	2
Environment or Climate	Board	54	54	100.0%	0.0%	0
Environment or Climate	Shareholders	233	233	22.3%	77.7%	0
Other	Board	231	231	11.7%	88.3%	0
Other	Shareholders	42	42	19.0%	81.0%	0
Extraordinary Transactions	Board	264	264	91.7%	8.3%	0
Extraordinary Transactions	Shareholders	4	4	0.0%	100.0%	0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion	Board	40	40	100.0%	0.0%	0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion	Shareholders	93	93	9.7%	90.3%	0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses	Board	80	80	91.2%	8.8%	0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses	Shareholders (1 inferred)	40	40	65.0%	35.0%	0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce	Board	40	40	100.0%	0.0%	0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce	Shareholders	75	73	31.5%	68.5%	2
Investment Company Matters	Board	1	1	100.0%	0.0%	0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (118 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where E Trade Trust broke with the board (2,508 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.: E Trade Trust filed 42,594 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 38,585 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 2,999 issuer names and 3 funds. They cover 32,949 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.: Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.: On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
396 items are outside both headline figures.: Besides the table rows neither figure uses:

Excluded	Items	Why
Not voted	0	Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type	175	Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate	0	The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote	221	The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

E Trade Trust proxy season coverage: 2025-2026 (this page).