proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Columbia Threadneedle › 2024-2025

Columbia Threadneedle proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Columbia Threadneedle reported 152,237 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 118,764 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.4% of the time. On the 3,078 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 2.8% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.4% FOR of 118,764 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 110,944 AGAINST 5,694 Abstained or withheld 2,126

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

2.8% FOR of 3,078 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 3,064.

FOR 86 AGAINST 2,992 Abstained 154

See the 86 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Columbia Threadneedle, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (267 inferred) 80,405 77,728 96.5% 3.5% 2,069
Director Elections Shareholders (2 inferred) 23 18 38.9% 61.1% 2
Corporate Governance Board 12,428 12,344 93.7% 6.3% 79
Corporate Governance Shareholders (7 inferred) 1,607 1,598 57.4% 42.6% 9
Audit-related Board 12,064 12,062 98.7% 1.3% 1
Audit-related Shareholders (8 inferred) 64 63 87.3% 12.7% 1
Say-on-Pay Board (649 inferred) 10,638 9,929 85.9% 14.1% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (10 inferred) 10 10 90.0% 10.0% 0
Compensation Board (92 inferred) 8,798 8,732 87.6% 12.4% 64
Compensation Shareholders (10 inferred) 487 487 23.2% 76.8% 0
Capital Structure Board (1 inferred) 7,997 7,992 94.1% 5.9% 1
Capital Structure Shareholders 224 224 78.6% 21.4% 0
Other Social Issues Board 371 371 97.8% 2.2% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,876 1,861 3.4% 96.6% 15
Environment or Climate Board 169 169 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 1,769 1,761 1.9% 98.1% 8
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 144 144 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 1,033 877 0.5% 99.5% 156
Extraordinary Transactions Board 676 676 92.8% 7.2% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 140 140 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 463 455 0.2% 99.8% 8
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 327 307 93.8% 6.2% 20
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (11 inferred) 147 147 74.8% 25.2% 0
Other Board 343 343 84.3% 15.7% 0
Other Shareholders 92 92 20.7% 79.3% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (1,057 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Columbia Threadneedle broke with the board (3,557 distinct proposals) →

What Columbia Threadneedle said it would do

The page above is what Columbia Threadneedle did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Columbia Threadneedle, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Columbia Threadneedle filed 152,237 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 137,616 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 4,014 issuer names and 118 funds. They cover 41,846 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
1,332 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type709 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote623 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Columbia Threadneedle proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.