proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › BAILLIE GIFFORD FUNDS › 2023-2024

BAILLIE GIFFORD FUNDS proxy voting record, 2023-2024

BAILLIE GIFFORD FUNDS reported 13,333 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 9,099 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 96.2% of the time. On the 88 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 39.8% of the time.

2023-20242024-2025

On the board’s own proposals

96.2% FOR of 9,099 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 8,753 AGAINST 263 Abstained or withheld 83

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

39.8% FOR of 88 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 88.

FOR 35 AGAINST 53 Abstained 0

See the 35 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

BAILLIE GIFFORD FUNDS, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (3 inferred) 4,642 4,444 99.2% 0.8% 41
Capital Structure Board 2,096 2,066 96.8% 3.2% 7
Capital Structure Shareholders (3 inferred) 3 3 100.0% 0.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board 1,803 1,753 96.6% 3.4% 30
Corporate Governance Shareholders 38 38 52.6% 47.4% 0
Other Board 1,180 1,148 98.2% 1.8% 9
Other Shareholders 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 0
Audit-related Board 966 917 96.1% 3.9% 10
Audit-related Shareholders 3 1 100.0% 0.0% 1
Compensation Board 964 947 94.4% 5.6% 7
Compensation Shareholders 4 4 0.0% 100.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 491 450 86.0% 14.0% 16
Extraordinary Transactions Board 313 306 97.1% 2.9% 2
Other Social Issues Board 42 38 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 68 68 23.5% 76.5% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 53 50 58.0% 42.0% 3
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 17 17 94.1% 5.9% 0
Environment or Climate Board 6 6 83.3% 16.7% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 31 31 51.6% 48.4% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 30 30 36.7% 63.3% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 2 0 n/a n/a 2
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 9 9 88.9% 11.1% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (6 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where BAILLIE GIFFORD FUNDS broke with the board (233 distinct proposals) →

What BAILLIE GIFFORD FUNDS said it would do

The page above is what BAILLIE GIFFORD FUNDS did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Baillie Gifford, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
BAILLIE GIFFORD FUNDS filed 13,333 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 12,360 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 490 issuer names and 16 funds. They cover 6,317 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
304 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted259 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type23 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote22 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

BAILLIE GIFFORD FUNDS proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025.