proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Allspring › 2024-2025

Allspring proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Allspring reported 67,810 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 53,929 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 94.1% of the time. On the 1,813 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 9.8% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

94.1% FOR of 53,929 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 50,726 AGAINST 2,068 Abstained or withheld 1,135

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

9.8% FOR of 1,813 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,811.

FOR 177 AGAINST 1,636 Abstained 0

See the 177 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Allspring, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (90 inferred) 37,286 35,962 97.6% 2.4% 1,127
Director Elections Shareholders (1 inferred) 14 1 0.0% 100.0% 12
Say-on-Pay Board (1,871 inferred) 6,201 5,816 90.1% 9.9% 3
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (5 inferred) 5 5 100.0% 0.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board 4,433 4,406 94.1% 5.9% 26
Corporate Governance Shareholders 879 879 35.7% 64.3% 0
Audit-related Board 5,108 5,107 99.8% 0.2% 1
Audit-related Shareholders (4 inferred) 29 29 86.2% 13.8% 0
Compensation Board (20 inferred) 3,202 3,197 83.9% 16.1% 5
Compensation Shareholders (5 inferred) 272 272 42.3% 57.7% 0
Capital Structure Board 2,612 2,612 94.1% 5.9% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 70 70 91.4% 8.6% 0
Other Social Issues Board 140 140 99.3% 0.7% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 1,049 1,049 8.9% 91.1% 0
Environment or Climate Board 86 86 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 967 967 4.7% 95.3% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 69 69 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 607 607 3.3% 96.7% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 66 66 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 242 242 13.2% 86.8% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 253 252 88.9% 11.1% 1
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 164 149 94.0% 6.0% 15
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (4 inferred) 83 83 94.0% 6.0% 0
Other Board 91 91 87.9% 12.1% 0
Other Shareholders 18 18 38.9% 61.1% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (2,000 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Allspring broke with the board (1,456 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Allspring filed 67,810 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 61,861 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 2,429 issuer names and 58 funds. They cover 22,792 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
581 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type382 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote199 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Allspring proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.