Chubb Limited 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

The 224 asset managers below reported 122,482,279 for, 529,289 against, 22,214 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 224 asset managers. See all 224 in the interactive database.

The 224 asset managers below reported 126,362,255 for, 1,096,558 against, 22,453 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 224 asset managers. See all 224 in the interactive database.

The 224 asset managers below reported 122,481,587 for, 37,906 against, 22,214 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 224 asset managers. See all 224 in the interactive database.

The 224 asset managers below reported 122,497,587 for, 21,906 against, 22,214 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 224 asset managers. See all 224 in the interactive database.

The 224 asset managers below reported 122,488,727 for, 30,765 against, 22,214 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 224 asset managers. See all 224 in the interactive database.

The 224 asset managers below reported 127,049,730 for, 254,563 against, 22,214 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 224 asset managers. See all 224 in the interactive database.

The 224 asset managers below reported 122,488,739 for, 30,754 against, 22,214 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 224 asset managers. See all 224 in the interactive database.

The 224 asset managers below reported 122,386,829 for, 132,425 against, 22,454 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 224 asset managers. See all 224 in the interactive database.

The 224 asset managers below reported 122,429,612 for, 89,641 against, 22,453 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 224 asset managers. See all 224 in the interactive database.

The 224 asset managers below reported 113,203,288 for, 9,925,281 against, 22,453 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 224 asset managers. See all 224 in the interactive database.

The 224 asset managers below reported 122,481,602 for, 37,890 against, 22,214 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 224 asset managers. See all 224 in the interactive database.

The 223 asset managers below reported 126,642,742 for, 244,093 against, 22,218 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 223 asset managers. See all 223 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Evan G. Greenberg as Chairman of the Board of Directors

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“6. Election of Evan G. Greenberg as Chairman of the Board of Directors until the Company's next annual general meeting”): 257,446,673 for, 55,185,489 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 82% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 209 asset managers below reported 107,408,088 for, 6,401,983 against, 814 abstained, 10,544 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 209 asset managers. See all 209 in the interactive database.

The 205 asset managers below reported 119,450,113 for, 37,093 against, 22,211 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 205 asset managers. See all 205 in the interactive database.

The 140 asset managers below reported 99,327,005 for, 26,114 against, 243 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 140 asset managers. See all 140 in the interactive database.

The 140 asset managers below reported 99,341,019 for, 12,341 against, 4 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 140 asset managers. See all 140 in the interactive database.

The 140 asset managers below reported 94,788,365 for, 4,564,753 against, 243 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 140 asset managers. See all 140 in the interactive database.

The 140 asset managers below reported 99,349,817 for, 3,542 against, 3 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 140 asset managers. See all 140 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Elect David H. Sidwell as Member of the Compensation Committee

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“7.3 Election of David H. Sidwell as Compensation Committee member until the Company's next annual general meeting”): 273,873,190 for, 39,077,356 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 88% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 7 asset managers below reported 79,643 for.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Frances F. Townsend as Member of the Compensation Committee

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“7.4 Election of Frances F. Townsend as Compensation Committee member until the Company's next annual general meeting”): 302,777,363 for, 10,183,621 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 7 asset managers below reported 79,643 for.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Michael L. Corbat as Member of the Compensation Committee

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“7.2 Election of Michael L. Corbat as Compensation Committee member until the Company's next annual general meeting”): 306,466,577 for, 6,485,713 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 7 asset managers below reported 79,643 for.

Description as filed by funds: Elect Michael P. Connors as Member of the Compensation Committee

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“7.1 Election of Michael P. Connors as Compensation Committee member until the Company's next annual general meeting”): 301,696,049 for, 11,251,161 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 7 asset managers below reported 79,643 for.

Description as filed by funds: Renewal of a capital band for authorized share capital increases and reductions

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“9. Renewal of a capital band for authorized share capital increases and reductions”): 330,556,940 for, 8,133,261 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 230 asset managers below reported 122,491,279 for, 59,222 against, 49 abstained, 10,544 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 230 asset managers. See all 230 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of the management report, standalone financial statements and consolidated financial statements of Chubb Limited for the year ended December 31, 2025

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“1. Approval of the management report, standalone financial statements and consolidated financial statements of Chubb Limited for the year ended December 31, 2025”): 337,612,181 for, 478,634 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “Agenda Items 1-13 submitted by the Company were approved in accordance with the Board's recommendations.”
Support: 99.8% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 225 asset managers below reported 122,105,328 for, 4 against, 22,270 abstained, 10,544 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 225 asset managers. See all 225 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Discharge of the Board of Directors

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“3. Discharge of the Board of Directors”): 309,919,814 for, 2,225,460 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.2% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Chubb Limited’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Approve Financial Statements, Allocation of Income, and Discharge Directors” (4 managers, 933 for).

The 224 asset managers below reported 122,105,255 for, 33 against, 22,226 abstained, 10,544 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 224 asset managers. See all 224 in the interactive database.

The 190 asset managers below reported 111,195,343 for, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 190 asset managers. See all 190 in the interactive database.

The 158 asset managers below reported 107,665,046 for, 1 against, 22,260 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 158 asset managers. See all 158 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Allocation of disposable profit and distribution of a dividend out of legal reserves - Distribution of a dividend out of legal reserves (by way of release and allocation to a dividend reserve)

The 69 asset managers below reported 14,360,612 for. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 69 asset managers. See all 69 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of the Sustainability Report of Chubb Limited for the year ended December 31, 2025

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“13. Approval of the Sustainability Report of Chubb Limited for the year ended December 31, 2025”): 336,424,257 for, 1,811,895 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.4% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 224 asset managers below reported 121,764,296 for, 105,861 against, 257,399 abstained, 10,544 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 224 asset managers. See all 224 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Homburger AG as independent proxy

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“8. Election of Homburger AG as independent proxy until the conclusion of the Company's next annual general meeting”): 338,508,401 for, 158,739 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 99.9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 222 asset managers below reported 122,103,354 for, 1 against, 22,215 abstained, 10,544 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 222 asset managers. See all 222 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: If a new agenda item or a new proposal for an existing agenda item is put before the meeting, I/we hereby authorize and instruct the independent proxy to vote as follows: For = In accordance with the position of the Board of Directors Against = Against new items and proposals Abstain = Abstain on new items and proposals

The 213 asset managers below reported 3,682,799 for, 118,287,464 against, 56,190 abstained, 10,544 unknown. The figure above is FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST + WITHHELD) of the shares these managers voted; abstained and unvoted shares are in neither half, and these managers are a subset of all shareholders, not the meeting result.

Showing the 25 largest of 213 asset managers. See all 213 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of the Chubb Limited 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“10. Approval of the Chubb Limited 2016 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated”): 306,008,978 for, 6,936,721 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Chubb Limited’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Amend Omnibus Stock Plan” (10 managers, Fund and manager reports combined; may count the same shares twice; no share total shown).

The 239 asset managers below reported 122,351,074 for, 189,148 against, 22,261 abstained, 10,544 unknown.

Showing the 25 largest of 239 asset managers. See all 239 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION UNDER U.S. SECURITIES LAW REQUIREMENTS

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“12. Advisory vote to approve executive compensation under U.S. securities law requirements”): 299,771,583 for, 13,120,560 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 211 managers: 121,947,425 for, 101,820 against, 22,216 abstained, 1,538 not voted, 10,544 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 1,001 managers: 174,181,169 for, 8,090,446 against, 1,000 withheld, 23,947 abstained, 222,801 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT UNDER SWISS LAW REQUIREMENTS: ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE THE SWISS COMPENSATION REPORT

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“11.3 Advisory vote to approve the Swiss compensation report”): 301,088,681 for, 11,808,686 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 209 managers: 122,337,496 for, 92,125 against, 22,216 abstained, 10,544 unknown. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 164 managers: 19,714,170 for, 20,323 against, 2,977 abstained, 131 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT UNDER SWISS LAW REQUIREMENTS: MAXIMUM COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT FOR THE 2027 CALENDAR YEAR

Chubb Limited’s own tally for this item (“11.2 Maximum compensation of Executive Management for the 2027 calendar year”): 305,650,550 for, 6,781,846 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 22, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Chubb Limited’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Approve Remuneration of Executive Management in the Amount of USD 98 Million for Fiscal 2027” (12 managers, Fund and manager reports combined; may count the same shares twice; no share total shown).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).