Archer-Daniels-Midland Company 2025-2026 Proxy Voting Records

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: M.S. Burke

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: M.S. Burke”): 382,722,238 for, 8,803,733 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “All nominees for election to the Board of Directors listed in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting were elected as follows:”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 191,575,046 for, 602,428 against, 10,741 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: T. Colbert

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: T. Colbert”): 387,530,708 for, 3,976,457 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “All nominees for election to the Board of Directors listed in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting were elected as follows:”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 191,899,128 for, 278,346 against, 10,741 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: J.C. Collins, Jr.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: J.C. Collins, Jr.”): 387,508,247 for, 3,997,730 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “All nominees for election to the Board of Directors listed in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting were elected as follows:”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 191,899,114 for, 278,360 against, 10,741 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: T.K. Crews

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: T.K. Crews”): 383,579,378 for, 7,938,306 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “All nominees for election to the Board of Directors listed in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting were elected as follows:”
Support: 98% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 191,633,059 for, 602,417 against, 10,741 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: E. de Brabander

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: E. de Brabander”): 386,369,162 for, 4,919,716 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “All nominees for election to the Board of Directors listed in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting were elected as follows:”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 191,957,109 for, 278,361 against, 10,743 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: S.F. Harrison

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: S.F. Harrison”): 385,684,616 for, 5,821,439 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “All nominees for election to the Board of Directors listed in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting were elected as follows:”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 191,954,338 for, 281,136 against, 10,741 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: J.R. Luciano

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: J.R. Luciano”): 375,603,213 for, 15,943,803 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “All nominees for election to the Board of Directors listed in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting were elected as follows:”
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 192,183,751 for, 51,723 against, 10,741 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: D.R. McAtee II

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: D.R. McAtee II”): 387,707,812 for, 3,777,173 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “All nominees for election to the Board of Directors listed in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting were elected as follows:”
Support: 99.0% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 191,957,117 for, 278,356 against, 10,742 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: M.C. McMurray

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: M.C. McMurray”): 386,083,554 for, 5,421,187 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “All nominees for election to the Board of Directors listed in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting were elected as follows:”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 192,228,831 for, 6,644 against, 10,741 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: P.J. Moore

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: P.J. Moore”): 375,269,351 for, 16,250,861 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “All nominees for election to the Board of Directors listed in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting were elected as follows:”
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 191,824,148 for, 354,328 against, 10,741 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: D.A. Sandler

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: D.A. Sandler”): 379,037,815 for, 12,484,213 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “All nominees for election to the Board of Directors listed in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting were elected as follows:”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 191,828,412 for, 350,061 against, 10,741 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: L.Z. Schlitz

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: L.Z. Schlitz”): 387,515,946 for, 3,994,109 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “All nominees for election to the Board of Directors listed in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting were elected as follows:”
Support: 99% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 191,900,127 for, 278,347 against, 10,741 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Election of Directors: K.R. Westbrook

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Elect Director: K.R. Westbrook”): 376,347,814 for, 15,155,065 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: Elected, in the filing’s own words: “All nominees for election to the Board of Directors listed in the proxy statement for the Annual Meeting were elected as follows:”
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 191,500,171 for, 678,302 against, 10,741 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Approval of an Amendment to the 2020 Incentive Compensation Plan.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 4: . The amendment to the 2020 IC Plan was approved by the following votes:”): 378,037,433 for, 12,430,162 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The amendment to the 2020 IC Plan was approved by the following votes:”
Support: 97% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Amend Omnibus Stock Plan” (3 managers, Fund and manager reports combined; may count the same shares twice; no share total shown); “Amend Incentive Stock Option Plan” (2 managers, 14 for, 2,521 against).

The 161 asset managers below reported 191,969,414 for, 143,438 against, 10,756 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 161 asset managers. See all 161 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 2: . The compensation of the Company's named executive officers was approved, on an advisory basis, by the following votes:”): 377,036,214 for, 13,692,455 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The compensation of the Company's named executive officers was approved, on an advisory basis, by the following votes:”
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

Also reported under other wordings, matched to the same row of Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s official tally and shown with their own fund figures; their managers are not in the figures or the table on this card: “Say on Pay” (2 managers, 1,699,776 for).

Fund voting reports and institutional-manager reports both cover this item. An institutional manager can report shares that a fund it advises also reports, so the two are shown separately below and never added together, and their sum is not shown (fund and manager reports combined may count the same shares twice).

Fund voting reports, all 149 managers: 191,731,034 for, 284,839 against, 10,752 abstained, 376 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Institutional-manager reports, all 760 managers: 221,768,211 for, 7,775,666 against, 297,233 abstained, 36,789 not voted. Showing the 25 largest; see all in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Ratification of Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the Year Ending December 31, 2026.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“Proposal 3: . The appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026 was ratified by the following votes:”): 418,977,505 for, 18,167,625 against — passed, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07).

Reported outcome: Approved, in the filing’s own words: “The appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026 was ratified by the following votes:”
Support: 96% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 150 asset managers below reported 191,055,774 for, 1,082,705 against, 10,735 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 150 asset managers. See all 150 in the interactive database.

Description as filed by funds: Stockholder Proposal Regarding Issuance of a Report on Pesticide Use Data Reporting in Regenerative Agriculture Program Disclosures.

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company’s own tally for this item (“5. The stockholder proposal regarding issuance of a report on pesticide use data reporting in regenerative agriculture program disclosures failed by the following votes”): 34,414,743 for, 354,197,019 against, per its Form 8-K filed May 12, 2026 (Item 5.07). FOR was not more than half of the votes cast. Whether the item passed is for the filing to say; its statement has not been read for this item.

Reported outcome: not verified — the filing’s own statement of the outcome could not be identified for this item.
Support: 9% of votes cast — FOR ÷ (FOR + AGAINST); abstentions and broker non-votes are excluded.

The 151 asset managers below reported 1,722,932 for, 190,140,905 against, 322,409 abstained, 364 not voted.

Showing the 25 largest of 151 asset managers. See all 151 in the interactive database.