proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Transamerica › 2025-2026

Transamerica proxy voting record, 2025-2026

Transamerica reported 84,169 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 66,213 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 94.3% of the time. On the 1,320 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 9.8% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

94.3% FOR of 66,213 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 62,407 AGAINST 3,092 Abstained or withheld 714

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

9.8% FOR of 1,320 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,317.

FOR 130 AGAINST 1,190 Abstained 29

See the 130 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Transamerica, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (129 inferred) 44,053 43,189 95.8% 4.2% 713
Director Elections Shareholders 6 3 100.0% 0.0% 0
Corporate Governance Board 8,995 8,978 94.0% 6.0% 9
Corporate Governance Shareholders (11 inferred) 1,420 1,401 36.5% 63.5% 16
Compensation Board (65 inferred) 6,379 6,354 88.9% 11.1% 18
Compensation Shareholders 102 96 17.7% 82.3% 0
Audit-related Board 6,057 6,056 99.2% 0.8% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (8 inferred) 47 47 63.8% 36.2% 0
Capital Structure Board 5,818 5,811 96.7% 3.3% 1
Capital Structure Shareholders (2 inferred) 78 77 72.7% 27.3% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 4,152 3,922 90.5% 9.5% 14
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (8 inferred) 13 13 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 363 363 99.7% 0.3% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 927 908 7.9% 92.1% 16
Environment or Climate Board 210 210 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 698 687 6.6% 93.4% 11
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 168 168 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 314 311 3.9% 96.1% 3
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 168 168 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 288 283 11.3% 88.7% 5
Extraordinary Transactions Board 406 406 95.6% 4.4% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 10 10 0.0% 100.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 180 175 93.1% 6.9% 5
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (7 inferred) 196 192 57.3% 42.7% 3
Other Board 161 160 41.9% 58.1% 1
Other Shareholders 76 76 27.6% 72.4% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 5 5 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (230 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Transamerica broke with the board (2,418 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Transamerica filed 84,169 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 78,512 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 2,301 issuer names and 44 funds. They cover 29,323 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
405 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted6 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type212 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote187 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Transamerica proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).