proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO › 2025-2026

MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO proxy voting record, 2025-2026

MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO reported 82,202 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 63,226 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 94.0% of the time. On the 281 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 5.7% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

94.0% FOR of 63,226 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 59,427 AGAINST 2,883 Abstained or withheld 916

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

5.7% FOR of 281 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 279.

FOR 16 AGAINST 265 Abstained 0

See the 16 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (15 inferred) 38,192 37,215 96.9% 3.1% 843
Director Elections Shareholders (36 inferred) 36 36 27.8% 72.2% 0
Corporate Governance Board (1 inferred) 10,448 10,100 91.0% 9.0% 308
Corporate Governance Shareholders (11 inferred) 744 726 9.1% 90.9% 8
Capital Structure Board 7,199 7,153 93.7% 6.3% 20
Capital Structure Shareholders (3 inferred) 30 30 50.0% 50.0% 0
Compensation Board 6,098 6,077 91.8% 8.2% 12
Compensation Shareholders 42 39 20.5% 79.5% 0
Audit-related Board 5,762 5,719 98.2% 1.8% 39
Audit-related Shareholders (3 inferred) 4 4 75.0% 25.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 4,842 4,628 93.7% 6.3% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (3 inferred) 3 3 100.0% 0.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 2,568 2,551 83.7% 16.3% 8
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 4 4 0.0% 100.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 499 486 94.4% 5.6% 13
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (4 inferred) 319 319 15.7% 84.3% 0
Other Social Issues Board 334 333 95.2% 4.8% 1
Other Social Issues Shareholders 164 158 6.3% 93.7% 3
Environment or Climate Board 64 64 50.0% 50.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 197 197 10.2% 89.8% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 10 10 0.0% 100.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 156 156 5.1% 94.9% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 74 71 1.4% 98.6% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 3 3 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (76 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO broke with the board (3,142 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO filed 82,202 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 76,102 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 4,064 issuer names and 5 funds. They cover 49,307 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
447 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted31 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type208 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote208 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

MASTER INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).