proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Lord Abbett › 2025-2026

Lord Abbett proxy voting record, 2025-2026

Lord Abbett reported 22,655 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 17,917 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 95.8% of the time. On the 373 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 1.6% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

95.8% FOR of 17,917 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 17,168 AGAINST 525 Abstained or withheld 224

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

1.6% FOR of 373 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 373.

FOR 6 AGAINST 367 Abstained 0

See the 6 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Lord Abbett, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (43 inferred) 11,474 11,225 98.6% 1.4% 225
Corporate Governance Board 2,480 2,471 95.3% 4.7% 5
Corporate Governance Shareholders (2 inferred) 283 282 18.8% 81.2% 1
Audit-related Board 1,778 1,778 98.7% 1.3% 0
Audit-related Shareholders 7 6 83.3% 16.7% 1
Capital Structure Board 1,767 1,766 92.5% 7.5% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders 15 15 86.7% 13.3% 0
Compensation Board (21 inferred) 1,720 1,713 91.0% 9.0% 0
Compensation Shareholders 13 13 23.1% 76.9% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 1,286 1,202 95.6% 4.4% 0
Other Social Issues Board 92 92 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 262 259 0.0% 100.0% 0
Environment or Climate Board 55 55 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 205 205 2.9% 97.1% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 50 50 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 78 78 0.0% 100.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 113 113 92.0% 8.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 50 50 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 54 54 0.0% 100.0% 0
Other Board 86 85 94.1% 5.9% 1
Other Shareholders 13 13 7.7% 92.3% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 62 62 100.0% 0.0% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 22 22 59.1% 40.9% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (66 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Lord Abbett broke with the board (315 distinct proposals) →

What Lord Abbett said it would do

The page above is what Lord Abbett did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Lord Abbett, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Lord Abbett filed 22,655 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 20,995 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 744 issuer names and 30 funds. They cover 8,807 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
123 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type84 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote39 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Lord Abbett proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).