proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › HC CAPITAL TRUST › 2025-2026

HC CAPITAL TRUST proxy voting record, 2025-2026

HC CAPITAL TRUST reported 84,223 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 63,563 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 89.1% of the time. On the 589 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 30.2% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

89.1% FOR of 63,563 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 56,659 AGAINST 5,442 Abstained or withheld 1,462

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

30.2% FOR of 589 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 584.

FOR 178 AGAINST 411 Abstained 0

See the 178 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

HC CAPITAL TRUST, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (292 inferred) 39,848 38,227 91.5% 8.5% 1,468
Director Elections Shareholders (5 inferred) 11 5 20.0% 80.0% 6
Corporate Governance Board 13,175 13,134 92.7% 7.3% 33
Corporate Governance Shareholders (7 inferred) 1,137 1,118 57.2% 42.8% 4
Capital Structure Board 7,945 7,945 93.7% 6.3% 0
Capital Structure Shareholders (3 inferred) 56 56 60.7% 39.3% 0
Compensation Board (87 inferred) 7,562 7,532 86.4% 13.6% 23
Compensation Shareholders (5 inferred) 91 86 40.7% 59.3% 0
Audit-related Board 5,415 5,415 97.0% 3.0% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (4 inferred) 74 72 66.7% 33.3% 2
Say-on-Pay Board 2,807 2,658 85.0% 15.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (4 inferred) 4 4 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Social Issues Board 379 379 98.2% 1.8% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 438 435 28.5% 71.5% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 757 756 71.2% 28.8% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 51 51 3.9% 96.1% 0
Environment or Climate Board 228 228 93.0% 7.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 446 445 36.0% 64.0% 0
Other Board 469 465 70.1% 29.9% 4
Other Shareholders 127 127 37.8% 62.2% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 184 184 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 152 152 17.8% 82.2% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 184 184 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 143 141 49.6% 50.4% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 140 130 88.5% 11.5% 9
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (2 inferred) 75 75 68.0% 32.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 32 32 84.4% 15.6% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 13 13 84.6% 15.4% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (409 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where HC CAPITAL TRUST broke with the board (5,042 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
HC CAPITAL TRUST filed 84,223 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 78,493 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 3,091 issuer names and 9 funds. They cover 41,501 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
344 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type165 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote179 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

HC CAPITAL TRUST proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).