proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › GPS Funds I › 2024-2025

GPS Funds I proxy voting record, 2024-2025

GPS Funds I reported 36,206 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 28,114 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 92.3% of the time. On the 227 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 0.4% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

92.3% FOR of 28,114 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 25,940 AGAINST 1,296 Abstained or withheld 878

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

0.4% FOR of 227 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 224.

FOR 1 AGAINST 226 Abstained 2

See the 1 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

GPS Funds I, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (5 inferred) 18,024 17,098 96.5% 3.5% 862
Director Elections Shareholders (53 inferred) 53 52 17.3% 82.7% 0
Corporate Governance Board 2,926 2,828 90.6% 9.4% 92
Corporate Governance Shareholders (12 inferred) 207 204 20.1% 79.9% 2
Capital Structure Board (1 inferred) 2,951 2,934 90.1% 9.9% 3
Capital Structure Shareholders (5 inferred) 17 17 47.1% 52.9% 0
Audit-related Board 2,941 2,935 99.4% 0.6% 6
Audit-related Shareholders (1 inferred) 5 4 75.0% 25.0% 0
Say-on-Pay Board 2,393 2,241 92.6% 7.4% 2
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (1 inferred) 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0
Other Board 1,933 1,836 93.6% 6.4% 97
Other Shareholders 31 31 0.0% 100.0% 0
Compensation Board 1,763 1,758 88.2% 11.8% 4
Compensation Shareholders (2 inferred) 62 61 9.8% 90.2% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 504 501 81.4% 18.6% 1
Other Social Issues Board 103 101 97.0% 3.0% 2
Other Social Issues Shareholders 143 141 1.4% 98.6% 1
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board (1 inferred) 149 117 79.5% 20.5% 30
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (13 inferred) 46 46 82.6% 17.4% 0
Environment or Climate Board 7 7 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 119 117 0.9% 99.1% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 1 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 64 63 0.0% 100.0% 1
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 13 13 0.0% 100.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (94 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where GPS Funds I broke with the board (2,057 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
GPS Funds I filed 36,206 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 33,460 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 2,701 issuer names and 4 funds. They cover 30,867 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
243 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type149 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote94 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

GPS Funds I proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.