proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Federated Hermes › 2024-2025

Federated Hermes proxy voting record, 2024-2025

Federated Hermes reported 76,535 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2025 season. On the 60,473 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 93.7% of the time. On the 1,463 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 11.3% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

93.7% FOR of 60,473 fund votes on board proposals in 2024-2025: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 56,654 AGAINST 2,731 Abstained or withheld 1,088

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

11.3% FOR of 1,463 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 1,453.

FOR 166 AGAINST 1,297 Abstained 15

See the 166 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Federated Hermes, 2024-2025. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (7 inferred) 39,752 38,515 96.1% 3.9% 1,022
Director Elections Shareholders (28 inferred) 61 40 52.5% 47.5% 21
Say-on-Pay Board 8,328 7,682 92.6% 7.4% 37
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (15 inferred) 15 15 100.0% 0.0% 0
Audit-related Board 5,861 5,847 99.7% 0.3% 8
Audit-related Shareholders (11 inferred) 18 18 72.2% 27.8% 0
Corporate Governance Board 5,361 5,303 97.1% 2.9% 21
Corporate Governance Shareholders (12 inferred) 296 289 65.1% 34.9% 7
Compensation Board 3,543 3,526 88.7% 11.3% 11
Compensation Shareholders (12 inferred) 280 278 2.2% 97.8% 2
Capital Structure Board 3,541 3,524 93.8% 6.2% 8
Capital Structure Shareholders 75 75 25.3% 74.7% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 562 553 96.9% 3.1% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 512 512 56.4% 43.6% 0
Other Social Issues Board 102 96 99.0% 1.0% 4
Other Social Issues Shareholders 522 516 15.3% 84.7% 2
Environment or Climate Board 15 15 100.0% 0.0% 0
Environment or Climate Shareholders 506 506 2.2% 97.8% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 332 300 97.3% 2.7% 2
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 5 4 0.0% 100.0% 1
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 4 4 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 292 279 7.2% 92.8% 13
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 3 3 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 231 231 25.1% 74.9% 0
Other Board 21 15 66.7% 33.3% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 1 1 0.0% 100.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 6 6 0.0% 100.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (85 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Federated Hermes broke with the board (2,060 distinct proposals) →

What Federated Hermes said it would do

The page above is what Federated Hermes did. Its published proxy voting policy — what it said it would do — is in the voting policy library under Federated Hermes, with the documents for each year and, where one exists, a year-on-year comparison.

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Federated Hermes filed 76,535 vote records for 2024-2025; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 70,209 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 2,683 issuer names and 55 funds. They cover 28,065 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
933 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted119 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type612 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote202 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Federated Hermes proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 (this page) · 2025-2026.