proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Equitable › 2025-2026

Equitable proxy voting record, 2025-2026

Equitable reported 441,926 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2026 season. On the 339,726 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 92.5% of the time. On the 3,486 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 9.6% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

92.5% FOR of 339,726 fund votes on board proposals in 2025-2026: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 314,312 AGAINST 17,075 Abstained or withheld 8,339

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

9.6% FOR of 3,486 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 3,466.

FOR 334 AGAINST 3,152 Abstained 33

See the 334 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Equitable, 2025-2026. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (744 inferred) 230,019 217,474 95.3% 4.7% 7,814
Director Elections Shareholders (23 inferred) 102 34 64.7% 35.3% 68
Corporate Governance Board (1 inferred) 38,731 38,048 94.3% 5.7% 430
Corporate Governance Shareholders (48 inferred) 5,103 4,902 30.4% 69.6% 27
Audit-related Board 34,193 33,899 99.3% 0.7% 257
Audit-related Shareholders (18 inferred) 173 167 70.7% 29.3% 6
Compensation Board (241 inferred) 29,396 29,064 89.0% 11.0% 74
Compensation Shareholders (8 inferred) 373 345 27.8% 72.2% 0
Say-on-Pay Board (1 inferred) 27,679 25,257 91.4% 8.6% 11
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (18 inferred) 24 23 100.0% 0.0% 1
Capital Structure Board 23,837 23,722 95.2% 4.8% 36
Capital Structure Shareholders (7 inferred) 339 333 59.5% 40.5% 0
Other Social Issues Board 1,214 1,213 99.4% 0.6% 1
Other Social Issues Shareholders 2,545 2,495 7.1% 92.9% 13
Extraordinary Transactions Board 3,435 3,150 89.6% 10.4% 197
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 43 42 7.1% 92.9% 1
Environment or Climate Board 685 681 99.4% 0.6% 3
Environment or Climate Shareholders 2,161 2,121 8.0% 92.0% 13
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 551 551 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 988 981 4.5% 95.5% 2
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 953 933 89.9% 10.1% 14
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders (11 inferred) 467 459 58.8% 41.2% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 551 551 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 747 719 7.9% 92.1% 11
Other Board 992 966 67.5% 32.5% 14
Other Shareholders 298 298 33.6% 66.4% 0
Investment Company Matters Board 34 34 100.0% 0.0% 0
Investment Company Matters Shareholders 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (1,120 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Equitable broke with the board (6,091 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Equitable filed 441,926 vote records for 2025-2026; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 393,894 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 7,290 issuer names and 72 funds. They cover 76,840 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
8,123 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted0 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type2,116 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote6,007 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Equitable proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026 (this page).