proxyvotesnow.com

Home › Asset managers › Brinker Capital Destinations Trust › 2023-2024

Brinker Capital Destinations Trust proxy voting record, 2023-2024

Brinker Capital Destinations Trust reported 58,241 proxy votes on Form N-PX for the 2024 season. On the 45,113 ballot items the board itself put forward — directors, pay, the auditor, capital — it voted FOR 91.2% of the time. On the 708 environmental and social proposals put on the ballot by shareholders, it voted FOR 18.8% of the time.

2023-20242024-20252025-2026

On the board’s own proposals

91.2% FOR of 45,113 fund votes on board proposals in 2023-2024: directors, pay, auditor, capital.

FOR 41,141 AGAINST 2,583 Abstained or withheld 1,389

How we count these

On proposals shareholders put on the ballot

18.8% FOR of 708 fund votes on environmental and social proposals shareholders put on the ballot. The board opposed 613.

FOR 133 AGAINST 575 Abstained 2

See the 133 it backed →

How we count these

By proposal type

A single “voted with management” figure makes every manager look the same: director elections are most of the volume and nearly everyone votes FOR them. The record is therefore reported per category, using the category the filer itself put on each item in its N-PX.

Brinker Capital Destinations Trust, 2023-2024. “Decided” is FOR + AGAINST, the denominator of the two percentage columns; abstentions and withheld votes are shown separately and are never inside a percentage. Counted in ballot items — one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting — never in shares.
Proposal typePut on the ballot by ItemsDecided Voted FORVoted AGAINST Abstained / withheld
Director Elections Board (101 inferred) 30,540 28,564 94.3% 5.7% 1,382
Director Elections Shareholders (8 inferred) 21 11 9.1% 90.9% 10
Corporate Governance Board 5,538 5,416 89.6% 10.4% 19
Corporate Governance Shareholders (3 inferred) 400 385 38.4% 61.6% 1
Compensation Board (29 inferred) 4,552 4,495 86.2% 13.8% 7
Compensation Shareholders (5 inferred) 131 127 11.8% 88.2% 0
Audit-related Board 4,299 4,272 99.2% 0.8% 0
Audit-related Shareholders (2 inferred) 36 34 73.5% 26.5% 1
Say-on-Pay Board 3,402 2,981 95.2% 4.8% 1
Say-on-Pay Shareholders (4 inferred) 4 1 100.0% 0.0% 0
Capital Structure Board 3,351 3,329 92.9% 7.1% 1
Capital Structure Shareholders 29 28 46.4% 53.6% 0
Other Social Issues Board 170 169 97.6% 2.4% 0
Other Social Issues Shareholders 455 426 13.8% 86.2% 1
Environment or Climate Board 101 96 100.0% 0.0% 3
Environment or Climate Shareholders 417 401 10.0% 90.0% 1
Other Board 285 284 70.4% 29.6% 1
Other Shareholders 16 16 18.8% 81.2% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Board 75 74 100.0% 0.0% 0
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Shareholders 198 190 16.3% 83.7% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Board 258 258 93.0% 7.0% 0
Extraordinary Transactions Shareholders 6 6 0.0% 100.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Board 75 74 100.0% 0.0% 0
Human Rights or Human Capital/workforce Shareholders 180 170 14.7% 85.3% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Board 150 148 82.4% 17.6% 0
Shareholder Rights and Defenses Shareholders 39 35 74.3% 25.7% 2
Investment Company Matters Board 2 2 100.0% 0.0% 0

An item the filer put in two categories is counted in both rows, so the rows add up to more than the total. Who put an item on the ballot is decided item by item: the filer’s own answer on Form N-PX (Item 1(h)), or, where the filing does not give one, the proposal’s own wording (152 items, shown as inferred). The two figures above use only part of these rows: the board figure, board proposals on directors, pay, the auditor, capital, transactions and fund matters; the shareholder figure, environmental, social, workforce and diversity shareholder proposals at US-listed companies. How we count these

Every proposal where Brinker Capital Destinations Trust broke with the board (3,939 distinct proposals) →

What is being counted

The unit is a fund-level observation: one fund’s vote on one proposal at one meeting. It is not a share, not a filing line and not a proposal.
Brinker Capital Destinations Trust filed 58,241 vote records for 2023-2024; after removing votes filed twice in different N-PX filings, that is 52,756 ballot items (fund-level observations) across 4,245 issuer names and 9 funds. They cover 44,232 distinct proposals: one proposal voted by twenty of its funds is twenty ballot items here and one proposal. Proposals are counted per issuer name and meeting, and wordings of the same director nominee are counted once; two different wordings of any other proposal count twice, so this is an upper bound. A fund that reported several directions for the same item is a split vote, counted on its own (see the table below) and not collapsed into the larger direction. “Issuer names” is literal: filers spell the same company several ways and those are counted separately here, so this runs higher than the number of distinct companies.
Share counts are not used anywhere on this page.
Share figures in N-PX carry their own long list of corrections in this dataset, and a share-weighted rate would inherit every one of them. Every percentage here is a count of items.
Abstentions are reported, never hidden inside a percentage.
On the board’s own proposals an abstention or a withheld vote is not support, so it is in the denominator of the FOR figure and not in its numerator. On shareholder proposals an abstention is neither support nor opposition, so it is excluded from the denominator and shown on its own.
1,288 items are outside both headline figures.
Besides the table rows neither figure uses:
ExcludedItemsWhy
Not voted126 Reported as not voted, take no action or do not vote. No position was expressed, so there is nothing to count.
Other ballot type414 Frequency ballots (one / two / three years) and anything else that is not a FOR, AGAINST, abstention or withhold.
Direction indeterminate0 The fund reported several directions for one ballot item with no shares attached to any of them, so which way it voted cannot be established.
Split vote748 The fund voted its shares in more than one direction on the item (for example some FOR and some AGAINST), the smaller part at least 5% of its shares. It is not collapsed into the larger part.

About this page

Every figure is derived from Form N-PX, the filing in which registered funds disclose how they voted every proxy and institutional managers disclose their votes on executive pay (say-on-pay, say-on-frequency and golden parachutes). Figures are rebuilt weekly; this page was built on October 13, 2026. The interactive database shows the same votes company by company, including every individual fund.

Brinker Capital Destinations Trust proxy season coverage: 2023-2024 (this page) · 2024-2025 · 2025-2026.